The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking 2025
October 20, 2026
No Comments
A critical reading of the 2025 survey of knowledge workers’ reported critical thinking during generative AI use.
Research-led explanations of human capacity, learning and technological change. Start with the foundations, then follow the evidence and related ideas as the Learning Hub grows.
A critical reading of the 2025 survey of knowledge workers’ reported critical thinking during generative AI use.
A 2025 CHI study of 319 knowledge workers found that confidence in generative AI was associated with less self-reported critical-thinking enactment and lower perceived effort, while workers described a shift from producing work to verifying, integrating and stewarding AI output. The study is important, but it is a survey of perceived practice, not a causal test of whether generative AI erodes critical-thinking ability.
A critical evidence guide for the Institute of Inner Technology Learning Hub
A critical guide to Botvinick and Cohen’s 1998 rubber-hand experiment, later measures and limits of body-ownership inference.
A critical guide to King and Hicks’s 2021 review of coherence, purpose and mattering in everyday life.
A colleague says that a meeting starts at nine, although the calendar changed overnight. You know the new time; she has not seen the update. Predicting…
Think-aloud protocols ask people to verbalize thoughts while performing a task. They can reveal process traces that outcomes alone cannot show, but what is spoken is partial, instruction-sensitive and sometimes reactive, so verbal report must never be treated as a transparent recording of the mind.
Top-down attention describes selection guided by current goals, expectations and task demands. It is a genuine form of control, but not an all-powerful command system: salience, history, bodily state and environmental structure continue to shape what reaches priority.
How learning travels to new settings, why far-transfer claims need careful tests, and how practice can prepare future learning.
Trauma can refer to exposure, response or lasting consequences; these meanings should not be collapsed.